Medicare Monitor
The Palm Beach Post's veteran Washington correspondent, Larry Lipman, tracks policy makers and interest groups who are shaping the future of the federal health insurance program for the elderly.Medicare Web Resources
Government
•Medicare
•Medicare Frequently Asked Questions
•Medicare Booklet
•Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
•Medicare Payment Advisory Commission
Organizations
•AARP
•America's Health Insurance Plans
•Brookings Institution
•Center for Medicare Advocacy
•Center on Budget and Policy Priorities
•Century Foundation
•Commonwealth Fund
•Families USA
•Florida 50+
•Heritage Foundation
•Kaiser Family Foundation
•Medicare Rights Center
•National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
•National Academy of Social Insurance
•National Center for Policy Analysis
Blogs
•AARP Issues Blog: Medicare
•Cato Institute Health Care Blog
•Entitled to Know National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare
•The Health Care Blog
Medicare at a glance
Medicare is the federal health care system that covers about 36 million people age 65 and older, plus 7 million disabled. It has four parts:
Financed by a 2.9 percent payroll tax divided equally between employees and employers.
Financed by beneficiary premiums and federal general revenue. Current monthly premiums are $93.50. Starting this year, individuals whose taxable income is more than $80,000 will pay a higher premium.
Financed by Medicare and beneficiary premiums, which vary among plans.
The plans are private and financed by Medicare and beneficiary premiums, which vary among plans.
-- Larry Lipman
RSS feed
What's on this page →
All the entries posted on June 27, 2008.
Categories
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F
Recent entries
Home > Medicare Monitor > Archives > 2008 > June > 27
Friday, June 27, 2008
Reid: Senate will try again next month
Reid said the Senate will try again when it returns from its July 4th recess.
“Senate Republicans will be given another opportunity to reconsider their unfortunate decision to hurt patients and doctors,” Reid said.
Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment |
Senate slammed on Medicare vote
Reaction was sharp and bitter after the Senate fell one vote short late Thursday night of passing a bill that would have averted a 10.6 percent cut in Medicare payments to doctors slated to take effect Tuesday.
The final vote on a procedural move to proceed was 58-40 after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., switched his vote to preserve his parliamentary options. Sixty votes were needed.
Democrats blamed Republicans and President Bush, who had threatened to veto the bill. Republicans blamed Democrats. Doctors and advocates for the elderly tended to place most of the blame on the Republicans.
Reid said this about the Republicans after the vote: “Our seniors and the health-care providers who care for them have only Senate Republicans to blame when Medicare payments are cut and other key protections expire. The House overwhelmingly passed a good bill in bipartisan fashion that ensures Medicare works better for every American senior and saves taxpayers billions of dollars - but Senate Republicans insist on standing with President Bush to protect insurance companies at the expense of patients and providers. This is nothing short of putting politics above the seniors and people with disabilities who depend on Medicare.”
Sen. Chuck Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee on Finance, said Democrats were to blame.
“The Senate leader’s take-it-or-leave-it approach and on-the-floor election-year calculations hurt doctors and seniors,” Grassley said. “It’s past time for the Senate to act responsibly and work out a bipartisan bill to avert an unfair cut in the reimbursement rate for doctors who treat Medicare patients.”
Here’s the irony: both Republicans and Democrats wanted to avert the paycut, but despite having six months to work something out they couldn’t reach an agreement on how to pay for it. Democrats wanted to take much of the money out of payments to private managed care plans; Republicans didn’t.
Dr. Nancy H. Nielsen, president of the American Medical Association , said doctors “are outraged that a group of Republican senators followed the direction of the Bush administration and voted to protect health insurance companies at the expense of America’s seniors, disabled and military families.
“These senators leave for their 4th of July picnics knowing that the most vulnerable Americans are at risk because of the Senate’s inability to act to stop drastic payment cuts for health care services that are needed by our Medicare and TRICARE patients.”
Judith Stein, executive director of the Center for Medicare Advocacy, said: “We are saddened that the misplaced priorities of some senators prevented a bill with overwhelming bi-partisan support in the House from coming to the floor of the Senate.
“As we approach Independence Day and celebrate American values, we need to remember our commitment to those who came before us and question the priorities of those who put the interests of insurance companies over the interests of Medicare beneficiaries. Once again we call on senators to pass effective Medicare legislation. It’s time to support people with Medicare and physicians over private plan profits.”
Robert M. Hayes, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said: “The 39 Republican senators who lined up behind President Bush to oppose this sensible and humane bill are agents of harm to older Americans. People with Medicare, as well as the doctors who care for them, should know that and tell them that as they go home for their July 4th recess. The vote shows a callous disregard for the older adults and people with disabilities in their states and a craven submission to the insurance industry.”
Barbara B. Kennelly, president and CEO of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare said: “Once again we’ve seen the profits of the insurance industry take precedence over a call for help from America’s seniors and their doctors.
“Instead of approving important beneficiary improvements for the more than 44 million seniors and people with disabilities served by Medicare, a minority in the Senate once again blocked action on legislation that would have begun to reduce the overpayment of billions of tax payer dollars to Medicare Advantage insurers.”