How They See Us
What in the world do they think of us? Cox foreign correspondents tell you in this blog devoted to how the world views America, our culture and our communities.RSS feed
What's on this page →
The entry titled "John Edwards and an alleged love child? Enquiring minds in Britain want to know ...," and any of the comments about it.
Categories
| RSS | |
| RSS | |
| RSS |
Commenting is open from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. M-F
Recent entries
- The worst Hollywood had to offer in 2008?
- Fans sneer at Britney Spears' comeback performance
- Who's NOT coming to Christmas dinner?
- Guns N' Roses album a plot to embarrass China?
- Europe loves Hillary Clinton, but as Secretary of State?
- Chinese say Yao Ming should fight back
- Coming soon to a theater near you ...
- More entries...
Home > How They See Us > Archives > 2008 > August > 04 > Entry
John Edwards and an alleged love child? Enquiring minds in Britain want to know …
By Shelley Emling | Monday, August 4, 2008, 08:59 AM
The British media says it is in a state of shock this week over the fact that the American media has chosen to ignore the juiciest political story of the month and possibly even the year: the discovery by National Enquirer hacks of John Edwards in the corridors of a Beverly Hills hotel, where his alleged mistress and alleged love child were also staying, at half past two on the morning of Tuesday, 22 July.
Says Guy Adams, media reporter, in today’s Independent newspaper in London: “Since Edwards was, until recently, hoping to be president and will almost certainly have a prominent role in any Barack Obama administration, his marital integrity is a matter of public interest. It could yet become an election issue. Yet neither the highfalutin’ New York Times, nor the Chicago Tribune, nor even the LA Times, on whose patch the whole sordid business occurred, have yet stepped up to the plate to report it.”
Adams says that the media’s old-fashioned reticence seems quaint in this day of kiss-and-tell journalism. “But it’s also depressing: one of the reasons America’s newspapers are dying is their perceived pomposity,” he said. “Readers say they are too timid to rock the boat; right-wingers complain (with some justification) that they conspire to suppress damaging stories about Democrats. The general public thinks they have simply become boring.”
Most importantly for the newspapers themselves, Adams claims that the Edwards story could be selling truckloads of newsprint at a time when media companies are hemorrhaging customers.

Comments
By JDavid
August 4, 2008 10:48 AM | Link to this
The SILENCE by the old Media on this affair is only equalled by their silence on the SURGE in Iraq & the great military successes in Iraq. The Decline of old Media Journalism began when LBJ said during VietNam. “God, if I have lost Walter, I have lost the War.” Cronkite wore(2) hats during that WAR. He was a trusted “objective” anchor, while he also became an anti-WAR advocate on camera.
By JDavid
August 4, 2008 11:25 AM | Link to this
The entire old Media was silent during the affairs of John, Robert & later Teddy Kennedy. The old Media was always in the tank or the Kenneys & the Dems. No surprise or shock here on Media blackout on Edwards